How business owners can stop chasing every shiny object like a dog chasing soap bubbles

by

I have a new plan. I’m trying to get in shape. I’m walking walk two hours a day as part of my plan. I’m listening to podcasts and courses to keep myself occupied while I walk.

I want to share a good idea with you that I just heard while walking around Barcelona in the rain, getting in shape, and getting wise at the same time.

The idea came up in a discussion between Dean Jackson and Frank Kern.

Both Dean and Frank are successful, influential, long-tenured Internet marketers who have made, I’m guessing, tens of millions of dollars for themselves and prolly hundreds of millions for clients and partners.

The discussion I listened to today was about focusing on what you’re irreplaceable at, and getting others to do the rest. Familiar enough stuff.

(It’s the “who not how” distinction, which Dean originated, and which his partner Dan Sullivan then turned into a best-selling book.)

At some point, Frank Kern threw out the following, less familiar thought experiment.

Imagine, says Frank, that you are a typical small business owner who has gotten to a certain level of success by working hard, and who is trying to get to the next level by working even harder.

The classic “10 million irons in the fire.”

And then imagine, in Frank’s words, that:

===

… you are personally enjoined — legal term there — you are personally enjoined from doing any of this stuff yourself, except coming up with ideas.

Which means now you have to pay for the “who.”

What that would bring — and I know the listener is probably like, “okay don’t tell me I have to do this, this is horrible” — what that would bring is incredible clarity and purpose in the execution of the ideas.

If you had to pay to execute on every idea, you would immediately get yourself out of the “I’ve got 10 million irons in the fire” thing. Because you’re paying for it, right? So it’s like, well crap, if I’m paying all that…

===

Maybe I found this insightful because I’m actually in the process of hiring an assistant, and maybe I’ll even end up hiring two. Always insightful hearing what you want to believe.

In any case, if you’re running your own business, particularly if you’re a “solopreneur,” one-man band, one-woman show, this might be a worthwhile thought experiment to put to yourself the next time you come across a hot new opportunity you cannot wait to jump on.

“What if I were enjoined to not do any of this myself, and I could only pay somebody to implement this for me?”

If your answer is a shudder, then consider whether this hot new opportunity, which you don’t find worth paying money to implement, is worth paying for in a different, much scarcer currency, namely your own time and energy.

On the other hand, if you find that you are okay hiring, then you’ve got options. You can still do it yourself. Or you can hire. Or you can even hire two people.

Anyways, I gotta go make popcorn and drink a beer. That is not part of my getting in shape plan. But it is important.

Meanwhile, if you want to hear Dean and Frank’s full discussion — recommended if you are more busy and less productive than you like — here’s where to go:

https://www.morecheeselesswhiskers.com/podcast/147

I finally get a nice review

by

For the past 10 months or so, I’ve been running ads on Amazon for my new 10 Commandments book.

Over the past month or so, it seems like Amazon is finally running out of people who are passionately interested in the connections between con men and pick up artists and Hollywood screenwriters.

To wit:

My sales have gone down… my cost of sale has gone up… and for what seemed like a stretch of months, all I got were carping reviews from disgruntled readers, who I guess should not have been reading the book in the first place.

Fortunately, with the coming of spring, it seems my luck is changing.

A few days ago, I got a nice 5-star review by a hypnotist and copywriter, Manuel Herrera Carillo. Manuel’s review is long but I will reprint it in full, for one because it strokes my ego, for another because it may convince you to give my book an open-minded read. Says Manuel:

===

I am a hypnotist and also copywriter. Sometimes the mind thinks that it cannot be impressed or amazed anymore, and a book like this tells you otherwise.

We live in an age of cognitive calluses. We scroll. We skim. We assume we have seen every trick. The brain folds its arms like a bored aristocrat. Then along comes John Bejakovic with a lantern and a grin, and suddenly the room rearranges itself.

This is not a book about scams.

It is a book about gravity.

The gravity of attention.

The gravity of desire.

The gravity that pulls a thought from maybe into yes.

Bejakovic gathers an unlikely council: con men, pickup artists, magicians, salesmen, propagandists, stand up comedians, Oscar winning screenwriters. On paper, they look like strangers forced to share a train compartment. In practice, they are all fluent in the same ancient language: influence.

The ten commandments are not moral instructions. They are psychological pressure points. Each chapter peels back another layer of the theater curtain and shows you the machinery. Not in a clinical tone, not with academic frost, but with stories. And stories are the original hypnosis.

As a hypnotist, I recognized the rhythm immediately. Pattern interrupt. Authority. Framing. Tension. Release. The subtle dance between certainty and suggestion. He does not describe persuasion as manipulation in a dark alley. He describes it as choreography. If you understand timing, you can lead. If you understand expectation, you can bend it.

As a copywriter, I found something even more unsettling.

The principles are transferable.

The same mechanics that allow a magician to misdirect a crowd allow a headline to seize a wandering eye. An so and so and so on.

Combine this principles with AI and you obtain a nuclear bomb of influence.

===

I don’t know how to what Manuel suggests, to combine the principles in my book with AI, in order to obtain a nuclear bomb of influence.

But maybe you can tell me, if you know more about AI than I do, and if you’ve read my book?

And if you know more about AI than me but you haven’t read my book:

https://bejakovic.com/new10commandments

Secret offer knowledge that’s too valuable to trumpet loudly

by

I’ve been going through Dan Kennedy’s Opportunity Concepts seminar recordings.

There are two great, truly great, Dan Kennedy seminars.

One is Influential Writing, in which Dan explains how to create a cult of personality in your writing. Basically, it’s what everybody with a personal daily email newsletter is doing or should be doing.

The other great Dan Kennedy seminar is Opportunity Concepts. It tackles the other side, not the copy but the offer.

Opportunity Concepts teaches you how to repackage, reinvent, recreate what you offer as an opportunity — something so new, so distracting, and so sexy that people want it based on its own merits, even if they don’t know you, even if it sounds preposterous, even if it’s expensive.

So today I’m going through Dan Kennedy’s Opportunity Concepts, maybe for the fifth time ever.

The seminar sold for $10k when Dan put it on live back in 2011.

The recordings sold for $1,500 after that, but are no longer available anywhere, including eBay or Dan Kennedy’s site.

(Don’t ask me how I got ’em, but I got ’em a long time ago, for free, though legally.)

So I’m going through Dan Kennedy’s Opportunity Concepts. And I decide on a whim to google “Opportunity Concepts.” There’s not much out there. but…

… there is a page on the Dan Kennedy’s website, saying that Opportunity Concepts has been turned into a book called Selling Opportunity.

The only way to get Selling Opportunity is to sign up to the Diamond Level of Dan Kennedy’s membership/newsletter.

The Diamond Level costs $297/month.

Much better than either $10,000 or $1,500, and really a drop in the bucket considering the value of this info.

But then, on one last hunch, I decide to go to Amazon.

I search for “Selling Opportunity.”

And there it is.

A recording of Dan Kennedy’s Opportunity Concepts, sold as an audiobook published by Nightingale-Conant… for $15.

I bought it immediately, even though I already have it.

I skipped around through it, just to see if it really is the Opportunity Concepts training.

It is.

Some parts are missing (a couple guest presentations, for example).

But most of it is there.

If you like, you can get Opportunity Concepts, reinvented as Selling Opportunity, below.

I won’t trumpet it any more. You either know or you don’t know what this is worth. If you don’t, that’s okay. If you do:

​https://bejakovic.com/opportunity-concepts

Two kinds of starving crowd

by

Around age 15, a short time after I had learned to read, I started going through the books of Henry Miller because his books were 1) banned upon publication in the U.S. and 2) had sex in them, and those two things are all the endorsement a 15-year-old boy needs.

Anyways, in one Henry Miller book, I forget which, Henry Miller, who was a kind of joyous social parasite, furiously writes about some cousins of his, who (it being the Great Depression) are starving.

The part that made Miller furious was his cousins’ patiently accepting their fate and subsisting on a leaf of cabbage a day, because, from I can remember, they are too proud or too feckless to ask for help in their starvation.

Henry Miller, who was living in Paris at the time, and was surviving on borrowed food, drinking borrowed wine, and sleeping in borrowed beds, couldn’t understand this.

Whenever he was starving, he would simply beat down his friends’ and enemies’ doors and beg and scream and complain until they fed him.

You’ve probably heard of direct marketing legend Gary Halbert. Halbert used to give talks in which he’d play the “hot dog stand” game with his audience.

“You and I have competing hot dog stands,” Halbert would say. “I’ll give you every advantage you want. I’ll just ask for one thing. Take whatever you want, give me this one thing, and my hot dog stand will whoop yours.”

Halbert’s one thing was a “starving crowd.”

Except, I’d like to suggest to you today there are two kinds of starving crowd.

There’s the “Henry Miller” starving crowd, people who cannot and will not accept their starvation, and who demand that the problem be fixed, and now.

And then there’s the “Cabbage Cousins” starving crowd.

Whether through pride, weakness resulting from starvation, or simply the fact that there’s a pound of bacon stashed somewhere in their house, which they secretly reach for late at night, the “Cabbage Cousins” starving crow accepts what to everybody else looks like unbearable starvation.

And if you wanna play the “hot dog stand” game with me, I’ll give you as big of a starving crowd as you like, provided that it’s the “Cabbage Cousins” kind.

Just give me a few Henry Millers instead, and I bet you I’ll push more hot dogs than you.

(You know what I mean. Don’t give me Henry Miller the broke social parasite. But do give me people who have some money, and a problem, and have shown that they are intent on getting that problem solved, and now.)

Anyways, I’m not sure if this was illuminating. But it is a distinction I had to draw for myself, and I figured it might be useful to you as well.

Maybe you’re wondering how you can know that somebody is intent on getting a problem solved, so you can distinguish the Henry Millers from the Cabbage Cousins in real life.

Fortunately, Gary Halbert has written up the answer for you. In case you’re curious:

https://thegaryhalbertletter.com/newsletters/direct_marketing_to_a_starving_crowd.htm

Is your list too small for list swaps?

by

For several decades now, I’ve been recommending list swaps as a way to grow your email list.

(List swap = you promote somebody else to your list, in exchange for them promoting you to theirs.)

The #1 objection I hear is:

“My list is too small to make it worth anybody’s while.”

How small is too small?

4 people?

100 people?

200 people?

I was recently on a call with a list owner who has a list of 1,500 entrepreneurs. He said he’s worried his list is too small to do list swaps!

That dude asked for my advice about approaching people for list swaps. What I told him is:

1. A fantastic lead magnet and solid emails will go a long way.

Right now, I’m doing a list swap with somebody who has a list of 150 people… because he’s willing to custom create a lead magnet I know my audience will get value from. Plus his emails are solid.

2. You can always offer to make things right.

If somebody’s list is bigger than yours, you can offer to promote them multiple times, now and then again in 6 months or in a year etc. (In the end, that’s the deal I ended up striking with the guy in point 1.)

3. Money can plug the gap. You can always offer to both promote the other person AND to pay them something to make the exchange more equitable.

So?

Are you convinced now?

Are you gonna rush out and start doing list swaps?

I hope so.

But if not, I gotta tell you my dark-psychology conclusion here:

I don’t think list size is really what’s holding people back from doing list swaps.

Rather, I think it’s the same old culprit that holds back pretty much everybody, pretty much all the time:

Fear of rejection.

Putting yourself out there… and having somebody tell you no or ignore you… and feeling so small and worthless because of it.

If that’s your situation, then I’d suggest, in the words of business coach Rich Schefren, that you put your business goals ahead of your personal development goals.

It would be great to not care about being rejected, or to just do stuff in spite of this fear.

But while you work on that, it can make sense to look for alternate routes to achieve your business goals.

I’d like to point you to an opportunity to do so right now.

Maliha Mannan, who runs the Side Blogger and who is a member of my Daily Email House community, has a list of 9,000 online creators and business owners and people who want to become such.

Maliha is auctioning off a classified ad spot in every Sunday edition of her newsletter… FOR THE REST OF THIS YEAR.

Bidding starts at $2.

More info here:

https://www.skool.com/anthill-club-6065/your-official-invitation-to-my-basementbackyard-party

I’m hiring an assistant

by

At the start of this month, on Feb 1, I got on the train and choo-chooed my way from Barcelona down to Valencia.

My motivation was that 1) I like Valencia and 2) for a few days only, Jordan Parker and his wife Diana would be there.

I’d gotten connected to Jordan some months earlier, through channels I can no longer remember.

Jordan and Diana — as far as I can explain it — are a kind of back-end operations and scaling team for creators. They’ve worked with a small but select list of clients, including creators you are sure to know (just check Jordan’s site, parkerlabs.co).

At the end of our time together, Jordan and Diana asked if I have any team members?

No, I said. I don’t wanna hire or manage anybody.

Ever since I quit my office job 12 years ago and started doing stuff for myself, not managing anybody has been a nonnegotiable tenet of what I do and what I want to do.

Jordan and Diana nodded, in a way that I felt was forgiving, but that seemed to suggest that I will learn my lesson in good time.

Maybe I’m just oversensitive. Maybe they didn’t mean anything like that. In any case, it stuck in my head.

When I got back to Barcelona, I started keeping a list of things I could outsource to an assistant.

I told myself I will hire somebody if I can get the list up to 20 items.

Well, just yesterday, I got up to 20. So I’m hiring an assistant. And the first place I will look is here, inside my email list.

Because an email list is not just a way of making sales or getting clients. It’s also a way of solving problems, answering questions cannot get a good answer to, finding partners, getting cool stuff for free, and yes, even hiring people.

First off, let me say who this job is not a good fit for:

If you think of yourself as either a copywriter or online creator, if you have ambitions of being either a copywriter or online creator, if you’ve done copywriting (or online creation?) in the past and found that it’s something you’re good at, chances are excellent you are a terrible fit for this job.

In this case, I suggest you do not apply, even if you might want to take the job simply because you would like to work with me, or because you think you might learn something.

The reason is that, if you are anything like me by temperament or want to do what I do, then you probably get bored quickly, need new projects and stimulation all the time, are not renowned for your diligence and attention to detail.

(Unfun fact: The morning of my trip to Valencia, I wrote a demanding email to my Airbnb host asking when I would get the promised checkin instructions. It turned out I had booked an apartment for March 1, not February 1.)

On the other hand, if you are present, diligent, happy, and get your kicks out of completing tasks rather than being constantly driven to jump to the next thing, then this job I’m offering might be for you.

What’s actually the job to be done?

Well, if you join Bejako Enterprises, your primary responsibilities will include helping me grow my Monetization Mastermind group.

There will be a mix of online research (read: snooping on people), sending and replying to emails using a pretty templated approach, getting people inside the group, and updating some internal documents with their data, etc.

There will be other tasks too (fiddling with my cart software, email software, Skool, all according to processes I will lay out and am doing myself now).

But those will be less frequent.

The stuff with helping me grow my Monetization Mastermind group, in all its repetitive, chirpy, detail-oriented glory, is what you will mainly be engaged in to start, should you apply for and win this position.

What about pay? What about hours? What about vacation time, dental insurance, and team retreats?

I don’t know. I’m winging it here, as I do for most everything. That’s why I need you.

If you are reading this email, if you suspect, based on what I’ve written above, that you might be a fit for this job, then hit reply. Tell me things about you to give me a clear idea that you might be a fit, and why.

If you do that, we can talk in more detail, and we can see if we can come up with a deal that works for both of us.

Daily Emails 101

by

Over the past few weeks, I have been spending a lot of time talking to Nick “The Knife” Bandy, and trying to persuade him to create a course that I want to buy and maybe even sell.

The background is that Nick has an email list, which he has been growing for the past year with a low-stress ad funnel to a low-ticket product that runs at a VERY slight profit, indefinitely.

In more specific numbers:

Nick’s low-stress ad funnel gets him about 100 new buyers on his list every month. And for every $1k Nick puts into this funnel, he gets $1.2k out before he’s even sent an email. He only checks in on it every few months.

Every time Nick mentions this ad funnel and this way of growing his list, my stomach growls and I start to salivate a little.

I’ve been trying to get him to create a course about this, because frankly I myself would love to have a similar funnel and would love to grow my list, with buyers, on autopilot, at profit. Come on!

The trouble is, Nick is kinda busy.

He’s got his regular $12k/month CMO retainer (part time, come on!)…

… he’s got partner revshare deals he has been kicking off…

… and because he has created one successful low-stress ad funnel, he has now decided to create a second.

I will keep pushing Nick, and maybe if I succeed, and he creates his course, I can make it available to you too.

Meanwhile, all I can do is daydream.

Today I was in the shower — no joke, and no direct response hyperbole — and I found myself thinking how I could create a low-ticket something called Daily Emails 101.

Daily Emails 101 would walk those who have or want to have an online business through the first 101 days of writing and making sales with a daily email newsletter.

Daily Emails 101 would be the most wonderful, exciting, and nichiest guide to this niche topic, and I’d make sure it inspires as well as informs.

Is this something you would want?

I mean, if I were to create Daily Emails 101, and if I were to promise to get you a deal on it that nobody else will get, not outside of this email, would you put down, say, $5 today to have the option to buy Daily Emails 101?

Hit reply and let me know.

If you say yes, and you’re serious enough to put down $5, maybe I’ll create it… maybe I will sell it to you for an unimaginably sexy price when it’s done… and maybe, when Nick does create his “low-stress ad funnel that grows your list at a profit” course, I will be ready to unleash it on the world, a few copies at a time (I’ll even put your name inside of it to say thanks).

Summation of stimuli

by

Here’s a personal defect on the scale of Derek Zoolander’s “I can’t turn left”:

I am particularly bad at coming up with “hot takes.”

The way I’ve gotten through life in spite of this defect has been to skip the news and consume things nobody else is consuming, because then even the most lukewarm take still tingles.

That’s how I’m currently making my way through a 574-page behemoth titled Principles of Psychology, from the year 1890, by a man named William James.

It’s slow going. I imagine it will take me till the end of this year to finish at the pace I’m reading.

But it’s been worth it already. On page 39 I came across the following idea, which James call “summation of stimuli.” Even though it’s extremely lukewarm on the surface, it still made me tingle. Says James:

===

The law is this, that a stimulus which would be inadequate by itself to excite a nerve-centre to effective discharge may, by acting with one or more other stimuli (equally ineffectual by themselves alone) bring the discharge about.

===

No? That doesn’t make it clear? I told you the book is slow going. James goes on to explain in slightly clearer language:

===

The natural way to consider this is as a summation of tensions which at last overcome a resistance. The first of them produce a latent excitement or a heightened irritability; the last is the straw that breaks the camel’s back.

===

Maybe that doesn’t help either. James fortunately gives a concrete example:

Take a dog (19th century scientists loved doing experiments with dogs).

Apply a weak electrical current to a nerve in the dog’s leg.

The current is too weak to set the dog’s leg to twitching.

But repeat the same weak current enough time, at a close enough interval, and somehow, even though none of the currents was enough to set the dog’s leg a-twitching, a-twitching is what you get.

“Ok,” you might say, “thank you for that lukewarm take on dog leg twitching. I gotta g-”

Wait! There’s more.

Because this isn’t just about dogs getting stimulated and starting to twitch. This is the basic neurology that underlies… pretty much everything, or at least a lot of human psychology and mental life.

I mean, I don’t have proof for what I’m about to say, because I’m only 15% through James’s psychology book.

But my guess is that this “summation of stimuli” is why one of the most fundamental techniques of persuasion, repetition, actually works.

If I say “I’m the best,” that doesn’t make it so.

But if i say “I’m the best,” every day, for years and years, and you’re forced to listen to me, then somehow, even though each individual claim is as hollow as every other one, the summation of them all turns into something with substance.

Maybe I start to genuinely believe I’m the best. Maybe you start to believe it too. And if we both believe it, then it does make it so.

Now let me make this practical to you:

In my Daily Email House community, a discussion sprang up today (ok, I sprang it up) about whether email marketing is dying.

I sprang that discussion up because I’ve seen “RIP Email Marketing” a surprising number of times in the past week alone.

The conclusion among House members was that email marketing is doing fine, but in any case, it was never about email marketing, not really, but about having a great relationship with your audience.

And the first step, and the most fundamental step, of building a great relationship with your audience is… summation of stimuli.

Showing up regularly, ideally every day, and ideally in different formats. Such as daily emails… and a community.

Speaking of, if you’d like to have your say in the conversation about email marketing and whether it’s dying or not, my Daily Email House is now accepting new members. If you’d like to spring up and join us:

https://bejakovic.com/house

The ecstasy and agony of shopping for what you really want

by

“Congratulations, it is now your turn,” the computer told me. “You have 10 minutes to make your purchase.”

I rubbed my palms together. “Here we go,” I said.

As long-time readers of my newsletter know, I’m a tennis fan.

I used to play tennis when I was kid. I sucked at it. So for most of my life, I’ve instead gotten my kicks vicariously, by watching pro tennis on TV.

This year, I’ve decided I’ll go to see tennis for real.

There’s a big event in September, happening in London, called Laver Cup. It was started by tennis legend Roger Federer. It’s a kind of invite-only competition of the world’s best and most charismatic players, who compete in two teams: Europe vs. the world (aka colonizers vs. the colonized).

Tickets for the Laver Cup went on pre-sale yesterday at 11am my time. You had to be signed up to the waiting list via email, which I was.

At 10:55am, I was nervously waiting in the digital waiting room for the pre-sale to start, and for my turn in the digital queue to arrive.

At 11:04am, I got the go-ahead. I could now proceed to pay an obscene amount of money for uncomfortable seats to watch grown man clobber a little yellow ball of fuzz for three days straight.

Like I said, I rubbed my palms in excitement, and…

“Your spot in the queue has expired,” the computer told me before I had a chance to do anything. “Please rejoin the queue for another spot.”

What… How? When???

Long story short, the ticket-selling website that was supposed to take my money for Laver Cup tickets wasn’t working right, at least for me.

At first, it was telling me my spot in the queue had expired. It kept sending me back to the waiting room to rejoin the queue.

Then, as I kept flailing around in a panic that my tickets would get swept up by somebody else, the site started marking me as a bot, scammer, scalper, even though I was scrupulously following their instructions on how to buy tickets.

I spent the next hour trying again… refreshing the page… closing down tabs… switching browsers… switching from my laptop to my phone… switching wifi on and off… sending links to a friend to buy tickets in my stead… and waiting on hold with customer support, who, after hearing me out and being very understanding, told me to go to wait and try again in an hour.

Which I did.

All with no result other than frustration and agony.

I’m telling you this story mainly to vent, because I never did manage to buy the stupid tickets.

But, since I make a point of squeezing a marketing lesson out of everything, let me squeeze one out here as well.

In direct response land, where I tend to live, we are used to doing a lot of persuading, convincing, and pushing to get prospects to buy. And even then, typical conversion rates are 2% or lower.

It can warp your mental picture, and make you think that people are begrudging you the money they send you.

The fact is though, if you find a buyer in heat, the way I was yesterday, they will fight and strive to overcome all sorts of obstacles to give you money.

My most dramatic experience of that, as a seller, came during the last 15 or so minutes of the auction I ran in December.

Every few seconds, people were bidding thousands of dollars more on the offer I had put up on auction, and strategizing how they can be the ones to pay the most before the deadline (the winning bid came in at $31k).

Yesterday, I ran my second-ever auction.

The offer on auction was “behind the scenes” data of auctions I will be running in the coming months, weeks, and days (including a new one, tonight, for a partner).

I won’t tell you how my auction yesterday did, since that’s info that I’ve sold to people yesterday, as part of much more detailed “behind the scenes” data.

But I have gotten messages today about my auction yesterday, like the following:

“I couldn’t be there (4 kids bath and bed) but would love to learn from the metrics! Is there a way I can do that?”

I’m considering making some for of my “behind the scenes” data available, to a limited number of people, even outside the auction.

If this is interesting to you, then hit reply and tell me what are you most curious about in the “behind the scenes” auction data I’m offering to share.

If I do end up making this offer available, you will have to reply like this to be able to get it. In other words, a kind of waiting list of the eager, though I promise to be less maddeningly arbitrary and glitchy than the Laver Cup site.

1 hour from now: My “Behind The Scenes” auction kicks off

by

My “Behind The Scenes” auction kicks off in 1 hour.

Here are 3 reasons, all from earlier today, why you might want to participate:

1. Today, I got login details to a moderator account for a community of 6k members, in preparation for an auction I am planning to run, built around an offer that sells for $10k.

2. This morning, I got a message from an auction partner I have already written a pre-auction poll. He wrote:

“I’ve received several very positive, ‘I want to win’ kinda emails. And here’s the latest in the screenshot. Lots of $1 but I think you said that’s expected. I’m good to push forward.”

3. Just a few minutes ago, I got a new potential auction partner contact me over Skool and say:

“Are you down for a short call early next week to plan our first auction in [his community?”

The behind-the-scenes details of those three partner relationships and the auctions that might come from them, and other partners and other auctions, are effectively what’s on offer today.

I ran my first auction back in December 2026. It made $31k.

I will be running more auctions with partners over coming the days, weeks, and months.

I am willing to give you a behind-the-scenes look into all those campaigns.

I will share offers (both public and behind-the-scenes)… sales numbers… DMs used to sell… my “day after” conclusions.

I will also share the sources of partners I’ve been getting, the strategies that led to getting them, my experiences working with them.

Think of it like a reality TV show, which actually teaches you something incredibly valuable, while you’re enjoying yourself and not even trying.

All starting at a bid of $1.

Only available inside a popup Telegram group I have set up just for this occasion.

Curtains go up at 7pm CET/1pm EST/10am PST.

If you’d like to be there to witness or participate (all participants will get a prize), here’s where to go:

https://t.me/behindthescenesauction