John Bejakovic

Double-checking the windows of sales escape

by

A true story, I mean, analogy:

A couple weeks ago, I was walking around town when a freak thunderstorm set in. I was only about a couple hundred yards from my apartment, but there was no braving this.

First, hurricane winds picked up, then a torrential downpour, finally large hailstones started beating down.

Along with a few dozen other people, I huddled in the metro station tunnel while the gods wore out their fury.

“Good thing I closed all the windows at home,” I chuckled to myself, as ominous music swelled in the background.

I got home and sure enough—

In the middle of the living room, a ficus ginseng plant, which banker and email-writing career coach Tom Grundy had sent me last year, was lying toppled over on the floor. Soil from the plant was all over the room.

“How did this happen?” I asked, possibly out loud. I walked around the apartment and came across a large puddle. One of the bedrooms was entirely flooded, including the mattress, which had soaked through.

It turns out that the window in that room was shut, but it wasn’t shut tightly enough. The furious wind blew it open, and then the rain and hail flew in, flooding the room, soaking through the mattress, and knocking over the plant in the living room and tossing the soil everywhere.

(The plant survived, by the way. It’s looking at me right now.)

I’m about to try to spin this story of emergency and disaster into a copywriting lesson, if you can handle one of those.

Last night, I hosted one of the Q&A calls for Copy Riddles, as part of the last-ever live cohort I will run of that program.

Several skilled copywriters and marketers submitted their bullets for the weekly CR bullet contest, including the following:

“How you could double your child’s IQ with this doctor-recommended breakfast switch. Page 17”

It’s a great bullet. It’s got a big promise I imagine most parents would respond to… a simple and intriguing mechanism… and proof in that phrase “doctor-recommended.”

There’s only one niggling thing, and it’s that, to my mind at least, the reader could read this and say, “Oh, great to know such a doctor-recommended breakfast switch exists! I’ll ask my pediatrician about it the next time I take the little monster in to see him.”

In other words, there’s a small, minor, minuscule chance, however unlikely, that the reader can be sold entirely on the promise of this bullet… and still won’t buy.

And that’s my analogy for you.

“You gotta close off all the windows and doors of escape for your sale” — maybe you’ve heard that advice before.

I know I did, but it didn’t really sink in for a long time.

In any case, knowing it is not enough, because really you have to know your audience as well, and keep learning about them, and keep shutting off all their paths to escape, including new ones that pop up.

Otherwise, even a seemingly shut window (bear with me here) can blow open unexpectedly, and then you have the sales equivalent of a mess in the living room and water all over the place and a mattress that’s been soaked through.

In other words, you have a lost sale, with good work put in and nothing to show for it. So it makes sense to double-check and triple-check the windows and doors of sales escape, using everything you know already and are learning about your skeptical, guarded, and inert prospects.

All right, analogy over. As for my offer:

While this is the last-ever live cohort for Copy Riddles, this program remains alive as an evergreen training.

Several of the people currently going through it have been through it three or more times already, on their own.

I also have it from a reputable source that Copy Riddles, even without the Q&A calls, is the best way to gain the money-making skill of writing sales bullets, short of being one of Parris Lampropoulos’s copy cubs. (I heard this from Vasilis Apostolou, formerly a copywriter at Agora, and now one of Parris’s copy cubs.)

If you’d like to find out more about Copy Riddles:

https://bejakovic.com/cr/

All these years, I thought I just liked living up high with a view of water

by

I’m reading a book called Yoga And The Search For The True Self — don’t ask — and last night I came across a passage that said:

“Anthropologists have shown that the favorite territory of human beings is high ground above water.”

“How did you know?” I said to the book. A couple facts:

#1 When reading another book (Psycho-Cybernetics), I tried imagining a kind of ideal refuge. I imagined a house on a hillside, overlooking a lake in the valley below.

#2 I currently live on the 9th floor, with a bit of a view of the sea (I wish I had more).

Upon reading that my unique personal fantasies and preferences are the same as those of the rest of mankind, I felt a little bit like Dave Chappelle when he walked into a Mississippi diner and found out what everyone there already knew, that “blacks and chickens are quite fond of one other.” Says Dave:

“All these years, I thought I liked chicken because it was delicious. Turns out, I’m genetically predisposed to liking chicken. I got no say in the matter.”

A-list copywriter Gary Bencivenga once said, “As a marketer you only have one power, and that’s to anticipate what people are going to think.”

We all have unique experiences and reactions, in the sense that we and only we experience them.

The strange thing, or maybe not so strange, is that other people have experiences and reactions that are very similar to ours. And if you take the time to learn and prepare and anticipate those, then, as Gary says, that becomes power.

This is the core idea of my new 10 Commandments book, published earlier this year in May.

I checked just this morning and it seems my book has gotten its first 3-star rating. Unfortunately, it’s just a 3-star rating and no written review I could lampoon.

All the written reviews I have gotten so far are 5-star and say things about this book like, “life changing,” “practical,” “packed with curious ideas,” “really fun,” “playful but legit,” “highly entertaining,” “the sharpest material I’ve come across on the subject,” “funny, weird, and most of all valuable.”

If you’d like to find out more about the unique reactions of others, and how you can anticipate those:

https://bejakovic.com/new10commandments

Am I just trying to provoke unsubscribes?

by

In reply to my email yesterday, marketer and long-time customer Fred Beyer writes:

===

Step 1: Tell your audience there are Mavericks who are worth serving and Gooses who are not (I refrained from using the plural geese ’cause we’re referencing a nickname here after all).

Step 2: Ask your audience which one they are, so you can ignore them appropriately according to your own suggestion in the email.

From Simple Money Emails: “What people do remember is the emotional stimulation”, and here you’re letting a large part of your subscribers know they are less desirable than the rest.

Are you just trying to provoke unsubscribes here? 😂

===

My primary goal yesterday was what I wrote in the email, to find out who on my list has their own email list that’s growing at a healthy clip.

At the same time, Fred raises a good point. It’s one I thought about yesterday as I wrote the email.

I decided that yes, I’m ok if a bunch of people I don’t have any plans on working with unsubscribe from my list.

It’s not about them being “undesirable” in some global, eugenic sense. It’s simply who I want to focus on working with, and who I don’t want to focus on.

Ironically, it didn’t end up happening. I’ve had just 2 unsubscribes so far from yesterday’s email.

This I think is a lesson in itself, and probably an interesting data point around the topic of natural authority.

But that’s a topic for another place, another time.

For today, if you are wondering about the reference that Fred makes, to Simple Money Emails, it’s my course on how to write simple, daily emails, like this one, which both bring in sales today, and keep readers — the ones you want — reading tomorrow as well.

For more info on that:

https://bejakovic.com/sme/

“Maverick” vs. “Goose” segments of your niche

by

Yesterday, I sent a handraiser email asking readers if, assuming they have an email list, they get on average 30 or more new subs each week. I got two kinds of replies. See if you can spot the pattern:

#1. No

#2. No!

#3. I do not. But that would be awesome. even 3 a week would be good for me

#4. Nope. 😕

#5. Hell no

#6. I wish LOL

#7. yea

#8. Yes!

#9. Yes, I do… I use linkedin/Facebook and Instagram organic to drive leads.

#10. I get about 100-150 a week and about 30-35 unsubs per week (daily emails)

#11. I get that a day.

#12. Daily

I appreciate everyone who replied. And as thanks for that, let me share a distinction I make, which might be useful to you, called the “Maverick” vs. “Goose” segments.

I first made this distinction last year, when looking at three successful coaching clients I’ve had, each of whom was writing daily emails as a major part of their business.

I looked for commonalities.

One commonality I found was that each of these clients focused on the “Maverick” segment of their audience.

If you have ever seen Top Gun, you know that the movie is about Maverick, played by Tom Cruise. Maverick is the cool, good-looking, talented fighter pilot who inevitably gets the girl and the glory by the end of the movie.

And then there’s Goose, played by Anthony Edwards. Goose is Maverick’s likeable, goofy-looking sidekick, who never gets to fly the plane and who is ritually sacrificed halfway through the movie.

So the question becomes, who do you want to build a business around? Maverick or Goose?

I looked at those 3 coaching students I’d had, each of whom was doing very well. I saw all three focused on the Maverick segment of their niche. Specifically:

* In the “basketball” niche: On high school coaches, rather than high school players

* In the “fitness” niche: On 44-year-olds, rather than 24-year-olds

* In the “marketing” niche: On people who want time, rather than people who want money

My point being:

Yes, some niches are more promising than others to start. You’re more likely to find players with money subscribing to an investing newsletter than replying to a debt relief ad.

But within each niche, regardless of how initially promising or unpromising, there are also the Maverick and Goose segments.

If you’ve already got an audience, or if one is building up for you as we speak, it makes sense to find a binary question you can ask people to classify them as either Maverick or Goose, and then to focus your efforts on working with the Maverick segment, at least based on what I’ve seen.

And on that note, if you haven’t yet replied to my handraiser yesterday:

If you have an email list, do you on average get 30 or more new subscribers every week?

If you do, let me know. I mainly want to know who you are and what you do. I don’t have any particular agenda, though I do have a half dozen possible ways you could help me or I could help you.

Question

by

If you have an email list, do you on average get 30 or more new subscribers every week?

“Play whatever you have”

by

The fact is, I don’t wanna be writing this email. In fact I’d rather be doing one of about a dozen other things.

Maybe it’s because, somewhere along the line in the 2,500+ previous daily editions of this newsletter, I used up all the good topic ideas I had, and I don’t really have a hot new one for today.

Maybe it’s because, by my standards, it’s very late in the day for me to be writing.

Or maybe it’s because I spent too long walking in the sun earlier today without drinking any water, and right now my eyes feel heavy and my head is throbbing.

And you know what?

Well, let me tell you what, in the words of one Tristan de Montebello, who was at one point a world champion public speaker (yes, a championship for public speaking exists), and has since started an online business that has trained thousands of people in public speaking. Says Tristan:

===

Play whatever you have.

If you show up and you don’t wanna be there, they should feel that you don’t wanna be there. Play the fact you don’t wanna be there, but play it with confidence.

What’s interesting about this idea is that it works in prepared speaking as well as in all of the other areas you’re going to be in.

What people tend to do is they will show up, in any environment, and they will start leaking.

They start leaking all of their insecurities. If they were hoping they would feel confident, and they show up and they don’t… a word comes out of their mouth wrong, they start fumbling, something happens that was not supposed to happen… everything internally is going to break down.

But what if instead you could keep those insecurities inside, plug the leaks, stay in character, and play whatever it is that you are experiencing, use that energy, in a confident way?

We call it staying in character. It kind of looks like conviction.

And what it does, it sends the message to your audience that they’re okay and you’re okay.

===

When I heard this a couple days ago as I listened to an interview with Tristan while massaging the elliptical at the gym, my ears perked up, for two reasons.

One reason is that this strategy, which Tristan calls “playing whatever you have,” is a topic I had planned on including in my new 10 Commandments book. I’ve found it to be a common element between the work of standup comedians, pickup artists, and hypnotists.

The topic didn’t make the cut because, well, there was space for only 10 Commandments, and I had others that I felt were stronger fit for the book.

Reason two my ears perked up was Tristan’s final sentence, about making your audience feel okay. That’s something that did make it into my book, because it’s probably the most important persuasion lesson out there, and that’s why it goes into Commandment I.

Anyways, if you’re interested in figuring out how to “stay in character” and “play whatever you have”:

Tristan’s online business for teaching people public speaking is called Ultraspeaking. They offer 30-day cohorts for getting you better with public speaking.

I’m thinking of signing up for the next one, although the $997 does make me wince. If I do sign up, I’ll have more to say about it. Meanwhile, if you want to speak better to groups, and you have $997 to spend, you can look up Ultraspeaking and see if it’s for you.

On the other hand, if you want others to treat you better, and happily go where you’d like them to go, and do what you’d like them to do, the Kindle version of my book is just $4.99, and is waiting to make you feel okay at the following link:

https://bejakovic.com/new10commandments

Free 14-day course after making $1.4M by writing online

by

My friend Kieran Drew asked me to share a free 14-day course he is about to launch, so that’s what I’m doing.

In case you don’t know Kieran, the man used to pull teeth and make gums bleed for a living. Sensing there might be something more to life, Kieran quit his 9-5 as a dentist and started writing online.

That was 4 years ago, this coming September 2nd.

Kieran likes to celebrate momentous events in his life by putting together overly generous offers. And so it is this time.

Kieran is about to launch a 14-day email course about the insights that have allowed him to make over $1.4 million over the past 4 years by writing online, first on Twitter and then via his newsletter.

And to atone for all the pulled teeth and bleeding gums, Kieran is making this course free. But you have to sign up in time, by September 2. That’s this coming Tuesday.

I won’t be writing more about Kieran’s overly generous offer. So if you’d like to get paid to write online, about stuff that interests you, and if you want to hear what wisdom Kieran can share based on his successful journey, then I suggest you sign up now, before it slips your mind and slips away forever:

https://bejakovic.com/4years

Once more, yesterday didn’t work out as I planned

by

Early this morning, I got back to Barcelona following a 2-week trip that spanned 5 countries.

Diligent readers of this newsletter know that last weekend, as part of this trip, I missed a layover flight, which led to an almost 12-hour, cross-country, cross-corn-field bus ride.

Yesterday, I missed a second layover flight, which led to a 17-hour total trip to get back to Barcelona.

As I sat at Frankfurt airport, uncertain that I would make it back at all before the “airport curfew” struck, and faced with the prospect of spending the night at an awful airport hotel and then another day at the airport, I swore to myself I would never ever travel again, or in fact ever leave the house.

I bring this up because I got a question recently from a long-time reader and customer by the name of Jordan:

===

This one might be a bit meta, but how did you start traveling and how do you travel so much? Did you start before having the income from this newsletter or after?

I’m also looking to travel more and I’ve found it intriguing how others do it. your insights are always very unique though.

===

I don’t feel I travel very much these days, certainly not compared to how I did a few years ago, when I was living in Airbnbs for almost 2 years straight. I got burned out after that, and it took me a couple years to develop any interest in taking a trip further than the local grocery store.

I also don’t really have all that much to say about “how to travel.”

I personally had zero obligations or restrictions when I decided to uproot and start living like a high-class hobo. I also had good money to support this lifestyle, which was pouring in via freelance copywriting work, a year or so before I made a first dollar from this first newsletter.

Since Jordan flatters me by saying my insights are always very unique, let me share the one possibly unique thing I can say about traveling a lot.

It’s something I experienced personally, and something that I also heard confirmed when I had a quick call once upon a time with now-dead pickup coach Tom Torero, whose worldwide travels dwarfed anything I ever did or would ever want to do.

Possible insight alert:

If you travel intensely for extended periods of time, particularly to places where you don’t know anybody or have no right being, you have to have a routine, and ideally you have to have something productive to do most days, like a job.

… which is ironic, because I imagine most people want to travel so they can get away from their routine, and because they don’t want to work.

But such is the human mind.

We have a few basic needs. The rub is that among those basic needs, we have ones that are diametrically opposed to each other, such as the need for novelty and the need for stability. If you swing too far to either pole, it leads to craziness and eventual breakdown.

The thing is, you don’t need a tremendous amount of daily productive work to keep you grounded and sane.

For me, writing this daily email does it. Plus, like Jordan says, writing this daily email has had the nice knock-on effect of generating an income, and even introducing me to people online that I ended up meeting in real life on my travels.

I got a course that shows you how to write daily emails like this one to your own list. If you’d like to find out about it:

https://bejakovic.com/sme

Email marketing strategy for selling DFY services

by

Reader Samu Parra writes in with a tough question:

===

Hi John!

Here’s a tough one:

I’ve found email marketing to be effective for selling info products and “done-with-you” consulting services. However, I get the sense that selling “done-for-you” services is a different story. I feel the buyer has a different relationship with the solution and their emotional investment is lower.

How do you approach the email marketing strategy for selling “done-for-you” services?

[Bejako here again. My beagle ears perked up at “I get the sense…” so I followed up with Samu to ask what experiences made him get that sense. Samu updates:]

When I look at my own clients, I see a big difference between consulting clients (DWY) and service clients (DFY).

The former usually come from email: they’re subscribed to my newsletter, they read it regularly, and they respond to offers.

Service clients, on the other hand, usually come through referrals and word of mouth. I feel it would have been hard for them to sign up for my newsletter, read it, and respond to an offer.

I think this is even more apparent when you’re offering something highly operational (e.g., an ERP software consultant) or it’s only a part of their responsibilities.

Email marketing probably works in these cases too, but my hunch is the approach should be different.

I might be biased. 🙂

===

On the one hand, Samu’s question makes intuitive sense.

Good prospects for DFY services are more likely to be busy and successful, and busy and successful people are likely to be swamped with emails, and therefore less likely to pay attention to any particular email, particularly if it’s an email that features a 1000-word personal story.

At the same time, I have had plenty of busy and successful people sign up to this very email list. A few I know about:

1. One of the founders of the possibly biggest brand in the digital marketing space, who has founded, scaled, or sold over 30 businesses

2. A secretive forex investor whose own clients include people who have been fictionalized in the Showtime show Billions

3. An A-list copywriter with decades of experience in the industry who I have written about dozens of times in these emails

4. An investment fund manager with a billion+ dollars under management

6. The founder of an online photography school that has had over 250,000 paying students worldwide

7. The founder of a mid-8-figure telemedicine platform

“Ok,” you might say, “maybe busy and successful people will sign up for a daily email list like this, but will they read? And maybe more important, will they reply to DFY offers?”

I’ve personally heard from all the people I’ve written about above in reply to my emails. So yes, they will read.

As for buying DFY offers, why wouldn’t they? In any case, I can think of two DFY offers I’ve made over in recent times:

1. DFY book writing and publishing

2. DFY weekly newsletter writing and publishing

For the DFY book, I got a bunch of interested prospects, many of whom were busy and successful. I ended up not working with any of them, but that’s because I had very specific requirements for what I was looking for.

For the DFY newslettter, one of the subscribers on my list above, the founder of the mid-8-figure telemedicine platform, actually took me up on that offer.

I quoted him $2k for four emails a month, and I made it clear I would not be writing these emails but would be hiring a copywriter for it. The busy and successful client said fine without batting an eye, which made me think a higher price might have passed as well.

All that’s to say, if you look for examples that it’s hard to use daily emails like this to sell DFY offers to busy or successful people, you will find plenty of supporting evidence for that. And no doubt, other methods of selling, such as referrals, might sell people who would never read daily emails.

At the same time, if you look for examples that daily emails can sell DFY offers to busy and successful clients, you will also find plenty of evidence for that. In fact, let me look for some evidence now:

Do you provide a service that can help people grow their email lists?

I’m talking about — but certainly not limiting it to — services like running FB ads… social media ghostwriting… book writing and publishing… podcast booking… custom software tools that can be used as lead magnets.

If something like this is your business, and if you have helped people grow their email lists with either qualified prospects or buyers, then hit reply. I want to know who you are and what you do.

I have lots of people with email lists on my own list.

List growth is always a “hungry crowd” topic, even with the busy and successful among them.

And if you are good at what you do and you get results — ie. quality email list subscribers — then I can get you clients for your services, without you having to do anything except accept and deliver the work.

New licensing marketplace

by

Over the past year, I’ve gotten excited by the idea of licensing intellectual property, which I got turned on to by Travis Sago.

On the surface, licensing IP looks a lot like an affiliate promotion of an info product:

* You license the right to promote somebody else’s info product, such as a course

* You then sell that product to your own list, or to a list you control

* You get paid some or all of the sale price for the products you manage to sell, while the creator of the thing gets paid the rest

But licensing also has several advantages over familiar affiliate sales. For example, if you license the right to promote somebody else’s product, you typically:

1. Can bundle that product (with your own stuff, or with others’ products) and sell the bundle instead of the standalone product

2. Can put the offer inside your own funnel as an upsell, and sell it as a frictionless and congruent one-click addon at a time when people are already “in buy”

3. Can collect money today, as opposed to getting paid weeks or months later (particularly relevant if you’re running ads to your funnel)

… all of which you cannot do if you’re simply driving traffic to somebody else’s sales funnel.

And those are just a few of the benefits of licensing over affiliating.

Of course, licensing also has a shortcoming that affiliating doesn’t have.

Affiliating, at least in the world of online marketing, is a familiar model. Lots and lots of businesses publicly offer affiliate programs, and large and proven marketplaces like Commission Junction and Impact and in the last resort Clickbank exist to bring together affiliates and offers those affiliates can promote.

In contrast, for licensing, you gotta reach out to potential partners yourself… explain and persuade them to work with you… strike custom deals… and do all this one-on-one. Few businesses advertise they will license their info products to you even if they might be open to it, and no marketplaces exist to facilitate the thing.

Until now.

Well, maybe.

The news, at least news to me:

Russell Brunson, the guy behind funnel-building software ClickFunnels, is launching something called OfferLab.

At first blush, I thought OfferLab is just a new affiliate marketplace. But no.

OfferLab is in fact a new licensing marketplace, or something like it.

It allows you to create your own custom funnels where you plug in other people’s offers… or to make available your own info products for others to use in their own funnels. I don’t know exactly how flexible this is, but from what I’ve read it sounds to me it offers the 1-3 benefits of licensing I listed above.

Last night, I signed up for OfferLab myself to look around.

Even though OfferLab is only in launch, or prelaunch, there are already a bunch of offers inside. I imagine that’s because of Russell’s control of ClickFunnels, which will provide a steady fire hose of automatically added licensable offers to OfferLab, in addition to any other offers that people add if OfferLab as a platform actually takes off.

Right now, OfferLab is free to sign up for and, as far as I can tell, to use, both as an offer owner and as an affiliate/licensee.

I have no idea whether this thing will take off, but it is something legitimately new, and it does offer to solve a legitimate problem in the world, and that’s the clunkiness of making licensing deals.

If you’d like to try out OfferLab (again, free, at least right now), and maybe find a new way to promote your own info products… or to find new products you could sell, upsell, and bundle with other stuff:

https://bejakovic.com/offerlab